Deadline of this Job: 21 September 2022
Specific tasks for both the analysis and strategy include but may not be limited to:
Becoming familiar with and using documentation already produced by the KBEST team, including notes from consultations, the preliminary gender equality analysis produced for the program’s initial proposal, the high-level gender strategy produced for the program’s initial implementation plan, and the blue economy labour market analysis that was just completed for the program.
Conducting additional literature reviews as needed.[1]
Preparing data collection tools as needed; for example, interview guides for the consultations to be conducted. The tools developed should align with KBEST’s results-based management (RBM) tools.
Preparing a mapping of the existing services provided to the diverse groups of women, girls, men or boys facing challenges and barriers, particularly as regards GBV and SEA.
Conducting consultations with a variety of stakeholders in the program’s two focus regions, and including input from women and girls (as actual beneficiaries)
Consulting with key KBEST staff.
Analyzing data collected.
Specific tasks for both the analysis and strategy include but may not be limited to:
Becoming familiar with and using documentation already produced by the KBEST team, including notes from consultations, the preliminary gender equality analysis produced for the program’s initial proposal, the high-level gender strategy produced for the program’s initial implementation plan, and the blue economy labour market analysis that was just completed for the program.
Conducting additional literature reviews as needed.[1]
Preparing data collection tools as needed; for example, interview guides for the consultations to be conducted. The tools developed should align with KBEST’s results-based management (RBM) tools.
Preparing a mapping of the existing services provided to the diverse groups of women, girls, men or boys facing challenges and barriers, particularly as regards GBV and SEA.
Conducting consultations with a variety of stakeholders in the program’s two focus regions, and including input from women and girls (as actual beneficiaries)
Consulting with key KBEST staff.
Analyzing data collected.
Deadline of this Job: 28 September 2022
The specific objectives of the end-term evaluation will be:
To measure project achievements against benchmark statistics of the indicators
To understand whether shifts in knowledge, attitudes and social norms around SRH and GBV occurred in the target community/populations as a result of Project interventions.
To examine the extent to which access to and care seeking practices regarding SRH and GBV services by women of reproductive age with and without disability changed as a result of Project interventions.
To identify specific interventions/approaches in the Project that were most or least effective in creating positive change and impact in SRH and GBV.
To highlight lessons learned from the project and make practical recommendations for improvement of future strategies and projects.
Key questions
The evaluation is expected to answer the following questions:
Measuring against indicators and targets
What are the end-line values for indicators (section 5.1) as per the project plan?
Did they reach the targets?
Are they meaningfully different from baseline?
Shifting knowledge, attitudes, and norms
In what ways has knowledge, attitudes and social norms of the target communities/populations improved, stayed the same or worsened?
To what extent can these changes be attributed to Project interventions?
To what extent were KRCS branches able to apply the recommendations from social norms assessments conducted in the internal mid-term review?
The specific objectives of the end-term evaluation will be:
To measure project achievements against benchmark statistics of the indicators
To understand whether shifts in knowledge, attitudes and social norms around SRH and GBV occurred in the target community/populations as a result of Project interventions.
To examine the extent to which access to and care seeking practices regarding SRH and GBV services by women of reproductive age with and without disability changed as a result of Project interventions.
To identify specific interventions/approaches in the Project that were most or least effective in creating positive change and impact in SRH and GBV.
To highlight lessons learned from the project and make practical recommendations for improvement of future strategies and projects.
Key questions
The evaluation is expected to answer the following questions:
Measuring against indicators and targets
What are the end-line values for indicators (section 5.1) as per the project plan?
Did they reach the targets?
Are they meaningfully different from baseline?
Shifting knowledge, attitudes, and norms
In what ways has knowledge, attitudes and social norms of the target communities/populations improved, stayed the same or worsened?
To what extent can these changes be attributed to Project interventions?
To what extent were KRCS branches able to apply the recommendations from social norms assessments conducted in the internal mid-term review?